Clicxpost

Menu
Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Trump set for “unifying yet vicious” Dinner Speech Friday as press event returns

trump speech friday

President Donald Trump will speak Friday night at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, an event pushed back more than three months after a gunman fired shots outside the original venue. The dinner now moves to the Waldorf Astoria hotel under expanded security, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday, describing a speech that will mix pointed attacks with laughs. “The president’s speech will be a combination of unifying yet vicious, and serious yet hilarious, all at the same time, if you can imagine that. One thing I can assure you, it will be entertaining,” Leavitt told reporters.

Trump will stand before many of the same news organizations his administration has sued, restricted or shut out of briefings over the past year. The dinner, traditionally a night of jokes at the president’s expense delivered by the president himself, arrives this year against a backdrop of legal fights and access battles that have strained the relationship between the White House and the press corps gathered to hear him.

What forced the delay

The original dinner, a black-tie gathering of journalists, politicians and administration officials, was called off on April 25 when a man tried to force his way through a security checkpoint and fired a shotgun outside the ballroom as Trump and his cabinet were taking their seats. Cole Allen, the suspect, pleaded not guilty in May to charges that include attempting to assassinate the president.

Secret Service officer Victor Gonzales was shot at the checkpoint and is credited with stopping the attacker. A protective vest kept him from serious injury, and he was the only person wounded that night. Friday’s rescheduled dinner will honor Gonzales along with Washington Hilton staff who helped guests during the incident, the WHCA said.

Secret Service Director Sean Curran briefed reporters Wednesday on preparations at the new venue. “We do expect bad people to show up,” Curran said. “It’s just a reality of where we are, but we’re treating it no differently than any other site that the president goes to.” Trump has cited the April shooting as one reason for a $400 million ballroom now under construction at the White House, arguing that hosting the dinner there in the future would give the Secret Service tighter control over the president’s security.

Friday marks Trump’s second time attending the correspondents’ dinner as president and his first time back since the shooting. He boycotted the event throughout his first term. The gala itself has run for more than a century, funding journalism scholarships and marking the First Amendment’s protections for speech and the press. This year’s program pairs Trump’s remarks with a performance from mentalist Oz Pearlman.

A year of confrontation over access

Trump has sued multiple news outlets since returning to office, dismissed critical coverage as “fake news” and named individual reporters in public criticism. His administration removed the Associated Press from the regular White House press pool and cut back many journalists’ access to the Pentagon. Last week he threatened to pull the broadcast licenses of television networks that skipped his prime-time address on election security, a speech built partly around claims of foreign election interference that ran counter to a U.S. intelligence assessment.

White House officials have defended each of these moves as necessary steps to guard sensitive information, tighten security and hold what they call biased outlets accountable. Trump has rejected the idea that any of it amounts to suppressing the press, arguing instead that he’s forcing overdue accountability on an industry he says treats him unfairly.

The picture isn’t one-sided. Trump has also given reporters more direct access than several of his recent predecessors, fielding questions during open-ended events and phoning into interviews on his own initiative. That mix, aggressive legal action paired with frequent, informal availability, has become a defining feature of how his administration handles the press.

Journalists push the WHCA to speak out

Several hundred veteran journalists and eight professional journalism organizations signed a letter asking the WHCA to use Friday’s dinner as an occasion to condemn what they called Trump’s attacks on the First Amendment. The letter reflects broader frustration among press freedom groups over the administration’s lawsuits, access restrictions and threats against broadcasters, criticism Trump has consistently rejected.

WHCA President Weijia Jiang said the dinner carries its own message independent of anything Trump says at the podium. The gathering “will be a statement that violence has no place in American life and a free press will not be intimidated into silence,” she said.

Friday night will test how those competing messages land in the same room: a president promising a speech that’s “unifying yet vicious,” a press corps pushing back on what it sees as sustained pressure, and a Secret Service detail bracing for the kind of threat that upended the dinner the first time around. The honor paid to Gonzales, the officer shot defending the event in April, will sit alongside all of it, a reminder of how close the tradition came to not returning at all.

Picture of George Mensah

George Mensah

George Mensah is a Senior Political & Conflict Correspondent at ClicxPost, covering global politics, international conflict, and economic developments. With five years of experience in breaking news and geopolitical reporting, he delivers fast, accurate analysis on major world events.

RECOMMENDED

UP NEXT

congo ebola outbreak cases

Confirmed Ebola cases in Congo near 3,000 after data reconciliation in worst-hit provinces

July 24, 2026 No Comments

The number of confirmed Ebola cases in the Democratic Republic of Congo climbed toward 3,000 on Friday after health officials reviewed data from two of the hardest-hit provinces and added more than 300 new cases to the national count. Congo’s public health institute reported 2,905 confirmed cases and 1,269 deaths in its daily update. The institute said the jump was driven largely by reconciling case data from Ituri and North Kivu provinces with the national tally, rather than a sudden surge in new infections detected that day. The death toll had already passed 1,000 in figures announced late Wednesday. The World Health Organization has cautioned that the real scale of the outbreak could run two to four times higher than the official numbers show, a gap that reflects how difficult it has been to track cases in the affected region. A slow start that let the virus spread unnoticed Congo declared the outbreak in mid-May, making it the country’s 17th recorded Ebola outbreak. But experts believe the virus had been circulating for weeks before that declaration, spreading undetected because of flawed testing and funeral practices that allowed transmission to continue in affected communities. That early gap between infection and detection helps explain why the case count has kept climbing even as authorities respond. Once an outbreak goes unrecognized for weeks, it tends to seed clusters in multiple locations before health teams can trace and contain them, and Friday’s reconciled figures from Ituri and North Kivu suggest that pattern has played out here. No approved vaccine against this strain The outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, a rarer variant of the virus with a fatality rate of about 40%. Unlike some other Ebola strains, Bundibugyo currently has no approved vaccine, which leaves health workers without one of the primary tools used to slow past outbreaks in Congo and elsewhere in the region. The absence of a vaccine puts more weight on containment measures such as contact tracing, safe burial practices and treatment centers, the same interventions that came too late in the outbreak’s earliest weeks. With confirmed cases nearing 3,000 and the WHO’s estimate suggesting the true number could be far higher, the coming weeks will likely test whether those measures can catch up with a virus that already had a head start.

Read More »
pakistan iran u.s. talks

Pakistan explores path to revive stalled U.S.-Iran talks, pushed by China

July 24, 2026 No Comments

Pakistan is exploring a path toward resuming stalled U.S.-Iran talks aimed at ending their nearly five-month-old war, three Pakistani sources said, following a push initiated by China. The effort comes as Islamabad finds itself squeezed between competing patrons, Saudi Arabia and China, at the exact moment the conflict has widened to threaten a second major oil chokepoint in the Red Sea. Exploratory discussions took place this week during a visit to Islamabad by Iran’s Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, his second trip to Pakistan in the last 10 days, the sources said. Momeni, who is considered close to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, met with Pakistani government leaders and army chief Asim Munir this week, according to Pakistani government statements. All three sources cautioned that the obstacles to any talks with the United States remain high, and they spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. A mediator caught between Riyadh and Beijing Pakistan’s position as a potential mediator has grown more complicated by the day. Earlier this week, Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi movement declared a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia, a close ally of Islamabad that signed a mutual defense treaty with Pakistan last year. Pakistan relies on Saudi financial support, and Islamabad has firmly condemned the Houthi attacks on Saudi tankers. Appearing too receptive to Iranian arguments risks frustrating Riyadh at a time when Pakistan needs that relationship intact. At the same time, Islamabad depends just as heavily on Beijing, which has also served as a major financial backer of Pakistan and has its own economic interests in reopening Middle Eastern trade routes. Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, discussed the new Middle East mediation effort with Chinese officials during a visit to China last week, all three Pakistani sources said. “The Chinese are unhappy because Iran’s attacks on other Gulf states and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz are hitting their interests,” a Pakistani government official said. Disruptions in the Red Sea would hit another trade route Beijing relies on, compounding the damage already done by the near-closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Dar and the Pakistani military’s public relations wing did not respond to requests for comment. China’s foreign ministry addressed the effort directly in a statement, saying “China supports the mediation efforts made by Pakistan and other parties.” The ministry added that Beijing will continue to “play an active role in restoring peace and tranquillity in the Middle East Gulf region as soon as possible.” Why Beijing wants this war over China’s stake in ending the conflict runs deeper than diplomatic language suggests. Beijing is Iran’s largest trading partner and the primary buyer of Iranian crude oil despite international sanctions on Tehran, purchases that come with a steep discount on the price of that oil. Over the past several years, China has also expanded its support for Iran’s security through dual-use components, chip equipment and satellite navigation systems, even though it has not overtly provided military aid to Iran since the war began. That relationship gives China leverage that Washington and Riyadh do not have, and Beijing has used it before. China has consistently backed Pakistan’s mediation efforts, and in March it dispatched its special envoy on a shuttle-diplomacy trip around the Middle East aimed at calming tensions before this latest round of fighting broke out. Pakistan’s current role builds on an earlier, unsuccessful attempt to end the war. The United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding in June to move toward ending the conflict, after mediation by both Pakistan and Qatar. That agreement was meant to open a 60-day window for negotiating a permanent settlement. Indirect talks during that window yielded no progress. Both sides accused the other of violating the terms, and fighting resumed. Houthi attacks raise the price of any new talks The renewed diplomacy now has to contend with a war that has grown in scope since the June memorandum collapsed. The Houthis said Thursday that they struck two Saudi oil tankers as part of their declared naval blockade, a move that threatens to open a second chokepoint for global oil supplies alongside the already near-closed Strait of Hormuz. For Pakistan, that escalation raises both the stakes of successful mediation and the difficulty of achieving it. A halt in attacks on Saudi Arabia and other Gulf nations would now be a “pre-requisite for any talks to resume,” a Pakistani official said. Pakistan has already conveyed that message to Iran directly, the official added, an indication that Islamabad sees the Houthi blockade as the immediate barrier standing between Momeni’s visits and any actual negotiation. That condition puts Pakistan in a difficult spot with Tehran. Iran has shown no public sign of reining in the Houthis, whom it backs, and Momeni’s back-to-back trips to Islamabad suggest Iran wants to keep a diplomatic channel open even as the fighting it’s connected to intensifies elsewhere in the region. Whether Tehran is willing or able to press the Houthis to stand down is a separate question from whether it wants talks with Washington to resume, and Pakistani officials have not said which answer they’re getting from Momeni. A narrow window, if one exists at all For now, Pakistan’s effort remains at the exploratory stage. Momeni’s meetings with Pakistani government leaders and army chief Asim Munir signal that Iran is willing to use Islamabad as a conduit, and China’s public endorsement gives Pakistan cover to keep pursuing the role. But the sources involved were consistent on one point: the obstacles to getting Washington and Tehran back to the table remain high, and nothing so far has bridged them. The failure of the June memorandum offers a preview of how hard that will be. A 60-day negotiating window produced accusations instead of an agreement, and the war resumed within weeks of the truce collapsing. Pakistan is now trying to open a second window under worse conditions, with a new front in the Red Sea, a Saudi ally demanding a halt to Houthi attacks before any talks begin, and a Chinese patron pushing for a resolution that protects its own oil and trade interests. Whether Momeni’s visits translate into anything beyond exploratory contact will likely depend on whether Iran is willing, or able, to meet the precondition Pakistan has already delivered: attacks on Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states have to stop first.

Read More »
u.s. missiles strike iran

U.S. missiles hit targets across Iran after Trump vows “major military punishment” over Red Sea attacks

July 24, 2026 No Comments

U.S. missiles struck targets across Iran on Friday, hours after President Donald Trump vowed “major military punishment” against Tehran and its Houthi allies in Yemen for extending the Middle East war to a second major shipping chokepoint at the mouth of the Red Sea. The strikes hit a Revolutionary Guards Navy headquarters in the Caspian Sea province of Gilan and the port city of Bandar Anzali, while a separate attack on the city of Ahvaz killed four people and wounded five, according to Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB. The strikes came two weeks after the collapse of an interim truce meant to end the war. Iran’s armed forces responded by firing at U.S. bases in neighboring Arab countries and warning residents there that Iranian forces may target non-military buildings used by U.S. personnel. The exchange marks a sharp escalation in a conflict that has already killed thousands of people over nearly five months, driven up global inflation and stoked fears of a broader economic downturn. Houthis widen the war to a second chokepoint The immediate trigger for Friday’s strikes traces back to the Houthis, the Yemeni armed group that controls northern and western Yemen. The Houthis announced a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, a country that has been diverting millions of barrels of oil each day by pipeline to the Red Sea specifically to avoid Iran’s near-total blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. That workaround no longer holds if the Red Sea route itself comes under attack. On Thursday, Houthi fighters struck two Saudi tankers in the Bab el-Mandeb strait at the southern entrance to the Red Sea. Oil prices jumped 7% in response, pushing crude above $100 a barrel for the first time since May. By around 1600 GMT on Friday, Brent futures had pulled back, falling more than $4 to just above $96, as markets absorbed the news of the U.S. strikes on Iran. The Bab el-Mandeb attacks forced several other tankers to reverse course and head north through the Suez Canal instead, a detour that can mean sailing around Africa to reach markets in Asia. Shipping insurance costs through the southern Red Sea doubled for some companies on Thursday, according to sources familiar with the pricing. Despite the disruption, half of the 18 ships that exited Bab el-Mandeb on Thursday were still carrying crude oil, including two Chinese supertankers willing to take the risk. Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz told a different story: only one tanker crossed the strait on Thursday, the lowest daily count since May 7, underscoring how effectively Iran’s blockade there has already throttled that route. Amid the escalation, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi spoke by phone with his Omani counterpart about security developments and maritime navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, which runs between the two countries, according to a statement posted to Araqchi’s Telegram channel. Oman has periodically served as a back-channel between Washington and Tehran, and the timing of the call suggests Muscat may be trying to keep some line of communication open even as fighting spreads. A possible opening for talks, via Pakistan Even as the military situation deteriorates, there are signs of diplomatic movement on the margins. Sources said Pakistan is exploring a path toward resuming stalled talks between the United States and Iran over ending the war, an effort that follows a push initiated by China. Exploratory discussions took place this week during a visit to Islamabad by Iran’s Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, his second trip to Pakistan in the last 10 days, according to three Pakistani sources. All three sources cautioned that the obstacles to any actual talks with the United States remain high. Momeni’s back-to-back visits suggest Tehran is at least testing the waters, but nothing in the reporting points to a breakthrough, and the pace of strikes on both sides on Friday indicates the fighting is, for now, outrunning the diplomacy. Trump threatens harder strikes as casualties mount Trump laid out his position on social media, saying he would hold Iran accountable for any further attacks by Yemeni fighters and that “major military punishment will be inflicted upon Iran and, of course, the Houthis, themselves.” In an interview with Axios, he went further, saying he was considering relaunching major combat operations against Iran. “They haven’t received enough pain yet,” Axios quoted him as saying. The human cost on the Iranian side has been steep. Iran’s health ministry said in a statement on X that 59 people had been killed and 666 wounded since clashes with U.S. forces resumed in late June. Iranian media separately cited the head of Iran’s top joint military command as saying Iran would kill a member of the U.S. forces for every Iranian killed, a statement that signals Tehran intends to match casualties rather than de-escalate. American losses have also mounted. The war has killed 18 U.S. service members. The Pentagon said Monday that 100 service members had been injured since July 7, though it noted 96% of them have already returned to duty, a detail the Pentagon appears to be using to frame the injuries as largely non-catastrophic. Strikes hit bases from Kuwait to Iraq’s Kurdish region Iran’s response to Trump’s threat played out across multiple countries hosting U.S. forces. The Iranian army said it had attacked U.S. military equipment depots at Al-Adiri, officially known as Camp Buehring, in northern Kuwait, along with U.S. troop positions at Camp Arifjan and Camp Doha near Kuwait City. Kuwait’s government said in the early evening that its air defenses were intercepting “hostile” targets launched from Iran, confirming that incoming fire had reached Kuwaiti airspace. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said separately that they had significantly damaged a surveillance tower used by the U.S. Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, a strike aimed at the naval command that oversees American operations throughout the Gulf. According to the semi-official Tasnim news agency, the Revolutionary Guards also claimed to have hit a U.S. barracks and fighter jets in Jordan, and separately struck a U.S. barracks, a spy balloon and Patriot air defense batteries in Erbil, in Iraq’s Kurdish region. Jordan’s military disputed the scale of that claim. Jordan’s army said it had shot down seven Iranian missiles and six drones, and state television reported that the attack caused no material damage or casualties, a direct contradiction of the more damaging picture Iranian state media presented. The U.S. embassy in Baghdad issued a warning to American citizens in the Middle East to exercise caution and remain on heightened alert, a standard precaution that nonetheless signals Washington expects the fighting to continue spreading rather than wind down. Where the war stands Five months in, the conflict has settled into a pattern of tit-for-tat escalation that keeps finding new fronts. What began as a fight centered on the Strait of Hormuz has now pulled in the Red Sea, Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan and Iraq’s Kurdish region, with Saudi Arabia’s oil exports and global shipping insurance costs caught in the middle. Iran’s declared policy of matching U.S. casualties one-for-one, combined with Trump’s public threat of “major military punishment,” leaves little room for either side to step back without appearing to concede ground. The Pakistan-brokered feelers toward renewed U.S.-Iran talks, and the Iran-Oman phone call on Strait of Hormuz security, are the only signs of diplomatic activity in the mix. Whether they amount to anything will likely depend on what happens in the days immediately following Friday’s strikes, and on whether Iran follows through on its threat to target buildings used by U.S. personnel in Gulf cities.

Read More »
SARB interest rate hike Thursday

South Africa inflation hits 5% two-year high, rate hike expected thursday

July 22, 2026 No Comments

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s central bank looks all but certain to raise interest rates again on Thursday, after fresh data showed inflation running hotter than economists expected. The rand traded at 16.4275 against the dollar at 1431 GMT, little changed from earlier levels, as markets digested the inflation print and positioned for the South African Reserve Bank’s rate decision. Annual headline consumer inflation accelerated to 5.0% in June, a two-year high, from 4.5% in May, Statistics South Africa said Wednesday. That came in above the 4.7% economists polled by Reuters had forecast and above the SARB’s 3% target. On a monthly basis, prices rose 0.7% in June, adding to signs of renewed price pressure on households. Transport costs drove much of the increase, rising 12.7% year-on-year and contributing 1.7 percentage points to the headline figure. Housing, utilities, and insurance and financial services also posted notable annual gains. Goods inflation climbed to 4.8% from 4.4%, while services inflation rose to 5.2% from 4.7%. “Given upside risks to the inflation outlook, concerns about elevated inflation expectations, and the risk of second-round effects, we expect the South African Reserve Bank to raise the repo rate by 25 basis points,” Nedbank economists said in a note. That would mark the SARB’s second consecutive hike. The bank lifted its benchmark repo rate by 25 basis points in May, its first increase in three years, citing the drag from the Middle East conflict on fuel costs. Governor Lesetja Kganyago’s monetary policy committee has flagged that further tightening could follow if the Iran war continues to feed inflation through energy prices. Standard Chartered economist Razia Khan said the unexpected jump in the June inflation figure, combined with worsening household inflation expectations, effectively sealed the case for a July hike. A Bloomberg survey of economists conducted before Wednesday’s release found most expect the SARB to lift its rate to 7.25%. Not everyone agrees a hike is warranted. Johann Els, chief economist at PSG Financial Services, has argued the data show little evidence that energy-driven price increases are spilling over into the broader economy, suggesting the central bank could hold off this week and act later in the year if needed. Some relief may already be in the pipeline. Fuel price cuts that took effect July 1 arrived too late to be captured in the June inflation reading, and economists say they could ease price pressure in coming months if they hold. Separate data released Wednesday showed retail sales rose 2.3% year-on-year in May, building on a revised 1.2% increase in April. The pickup suggests South African consumers are still spending despite the squeeze from higher borrowing costs and rising prices, though a further rate increase this week would add to the pressure on household budgets. Equity markets shrugged off the inflation surprise. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange’s Top-40 index was last up 0.9% on the day. Bonds sold off sharply. South Africa’s benchmark 2035 government bond weakened, pushing its yield up 12 basis points to 8.665%, as investors priced in a tighter monetary policy path and the prospect of borrowing costs staying elevated for longer. The inflation reading lands as South Africa’s central bank weighs how much of the current price pressure stems from global energy markets rather than domestic demand. The SARB has pointed to persistently high oil prices and Middle East tensions as key upside risks to its outlook, alongside a rand that has weakened at times this year against a backdrop of global uncertainty. Should the strait disruptions tied to the conflict ease and oil tanker flows normalize, some economists expect global crude prices to soften, which would take pressure off South Africa’s import-heavy inflation basket and could give the SARB room to pause its tightening cycle later in the year. For now, the bank’s quarterly projection model has already been revised higher, with its 2026 and 2027 inflation forecasts lifted in May. Thursday’s decision will show whether policymakers believe June’s spike is a one-off tied to global oil markets or the start of a more persistent trend requiring sustained tightening.

Read More »
US troops killed Iran war Jordan

Trump Honors 4 fallen troops at dover as Iran War frustration grows in congress

July 22, 2026 No Comments

Now I have solid corroboration and additional context. Writing the article.President Donald Trump attended a dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday for four U.S. service members who returned home in flag-draped caskets after being killed in Iranian attacks in the Middle East. The ceremony marks the third such transfer Trump has attended since the war with Iran began in February, and it comes as frustration with the conflict grows in both parties on Capitol Hill. “So we’re going to honor them. And one of the hardest things to do for me is too much, but has to be done,” Trump said before leaving for the ceremony. The war has cost U.S. taxpayers at least $37.5 billion so far, according to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and has killed 18 U.S. service members and injured more than 450 troops. It has killed thousands of Iranians. Analysts have told reporters the true price tag likely runs higher than the Pentagon’s public figure, since it excludes some equipment losses and long-term veteran care. Presidents, vice presidents and other dignitaries routinely attend dignified transfers at Dover, home to the largest U.S. military mortuary, during wartime deaths. Three of the four troops honored Wednesday were killed Friday when an Iranian missile struck their sleeping quarters at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan: First Lieutenant Tyler James Feehan, 25, Sergeant Angel S. Rampersad, 28, and Private Isabella Gonzales, 19, all assigned to U.S. Army air defense brigades. The fourth, Sergeant Michael Emmanuel Swinton, 30, died Sunday in Erbil, Iraq, during a controlled detonation of an Iranian attack drone. The Pentagon said Monday that 100 service members have been wounded since July 7, and 96% of them have returned to duty. The strikes on the Jordan base came during an intense stretch of fighting; U.S. forces have carried out 11 consecutive nights of strikes on Iran, targeting military command centers, maritime capabilities, aircraft hangars and drone storage sites that the Pentagon says threaten commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have raised questions about the war’s direction and cost. At a Senate hearing this week, Hegseth defended his request for tens of billions of dollars in additional funding after facing sharp questioning from senators on both sides of the aisle about what the campaign has achieved. The war has caused global oil prices to rise and shows no signs of ending. Trump has offered shifting justifications for the conflict’s objectives since it began in February. Public opinion has soured as the fighting has dragged on. Four in five Americans expect the war with Iran to continue for an extended period, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted earlier this month, and 37% of respondents said they approved of U.S. military strikes against Iran. Separate polling has found even fewer Americans, roughly one in four, believe the war has been worth its costs. Trump’s approval rating has hovered near the lowest levels of his political career since the war began. Republican strategists have warned that rising living costs, driven in part by higher gas prices tied to the conflict, have offset whatever political benefit Trump hoped to gain from his tax cuts. That economic pressure carries added weight heading into November’s midterm elections. Higher gas prices and broader cost-of-living concerns pose a political risk to Republicans, who could lose their House majority and possibly their Senate control if the trend continues. Trump has not attended every dignified transfer since the war began. In March, he skipped the ceremony for a soldier who died of wounds sustained in an attack on a Saudi air base, sending Vice President JD Vance and Hegseth in his place while he made a public appearance in Florida. That absence drew criticism given the administration’s heavy promotion of Trump’s presence at earlier ceremonies, including one in March for six soldiers killed in a drone strike on Port Shuaiba, Kuwait. Wednesday’s ceremony unfolded against the backdrop of a broader regional escalation. Iran has expanded its retaliatory strikes beyond U.S. forces directly, hitting American-allied nations that host U.S. bases. Iranian missiles and drones have struck targets in Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain in recent days, including a Kuwaiti water desalination plant that supplies a significant share of the country’s drinking water. The ceasefire reached between Washington and Tehran last month has effectively collapsed, with both sides now trading strikes on a near-nightly basis and no clear off-ramp in sight.

Read More »
Strait of Hormuz attack

Trump vows to bomb Iranian Bridge or Power Plant for every Hormuz ship attack

July 22, 2026 No Comments

U.S. President Donald Trump repeated his threat to strike Iranian infrastructure on Wednesday, saying American forces would destroy one bridge or power plant in Iran every time Tehran fires on a ship in the Strait of Hormuz. “Any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. The warning follows a week of intensifying strikes between the two countries. U.S. forces bombed southern Iran overnight after Trump vowed retaliation for the deaths of American soldiers. Iran answered by hitting American-linked sites across the region. The Iranian military fired six missiles at Jordan, and Jordan’s air defenses intercepted and shot down four drones while two remaining missiles landed in remote, uninhabited areas without causing casualties or damage. Iran has stepped up strikes on Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain in recent days, all three of which host U.S. military bases. The infrastructure threat is not new. Trump first raised it in early April, when he gave Iran a deadline to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face what he called “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one.” He has repeated variations of that warning through the spring and into the summer as the standoff over the strait has dragged on without resolution. The strait matters because it carries a large share of the world’s seaborne oil trade, and it has been effectively shut since fighting between the U.S., Israel and Iran broke out in late February. Iran considers control of the waterway its strongest point of leverage in the conflict and has repeatedly fired on vessels it says failed to coordinate transit with Iranian authorities. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking Wednesday at an ASEAN gathering in Manila, framed the standoff over the strait in economic terms. He said the “fundamental principle of freedom of navigation” is at stake, adding that if that principle is threatened, the global economy is threatened along with the rules that have underpinned international trade for a century and a half. Trump’s threats have already translated into action. The United States expanded its campaign against Iran by hitting more bridges and energy sites and collapsing a tower at a major Iranian port, following through on Trump’s pledge to target infrastructure and pressure Tehran over the strait. Iran retaliated by striking U.S.-allied nations in the region. Iranian missiles hit Qatar, which has served as a mediator in the war, and Kuwait, where one of the country’s water desalination plants sustained damage. Kuwait relies on desalination for roughly 90% of its drinking water. International law experts and world leaders have criticized the threats as illegal. International humanitarian law bars attacks on infrastructure considered indispensable to a civilian population’s survival, and it requires that any collateral harm to civilians not be excessive relative to the military advantage a strike would produce. Human rights advocates have warned that hitting Iran’s power grid would risk widespread blackouts, with knock-on effects for hospitals, water treatment systems and food supply chains. Tehran has accused Trump of planning to commit war crimes and has threatened to answer any infrastructure strikes with attacks of its own on facilities in Israel and other Gulf states. Iran’s judiciary-linked outlet Mizan has previously described Trump’s rhetoric toward Iran as insulting, and some Iranian officials argue the language reflects desperation rather than strength. The threats have also drawn pushback in Washington. When Trump first floated mass strikes on Iran’s power grid in April, some lawmakers, including members of his own party, voiced discomfort with the scale of the plan, and Democratic leaders in the Senate criticized the approach publicly. Trump’s ultimatums have not always led to the strikes he promised. In the spring, he set and then extended multiple deadlines for Iran to reopen the strait, citing progress in indirect talks mediated by Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey. Those negotiations produced no lasting breakthrough, and the interim ceasefire reached last month has since broken down entirely, with both sides resuming direct strikes on each other’s territory and allies. The current round of fighting marks one of the most intense periods of the conflict since it began in February, with Iran now striking three separate U.S.-aligned states in a matter of days and the United States expanding its target list inside Iran to include transportation and energy infrastructure well beyond military sites. Neither side has signaled willingness to de-escalate, and the strait remains closed to commercial traffic, driving continued volatility in global oil markets.

Read More »
senegal faye endorses macky sall

Senegal’s Faye endorses Sall for UN’s top job, bridging a bitter political rift

July 20, 2026 No Comments

Senegal’s president backs his predecessor’s bid to lead the United Nations, months after accusing his administration of financial mismanagement. Senegalese President Bassirou Diomaye Faye has thrown his support behind former President Macky Sall’s campaign to become the next United Nations secretary-general, the foreign ministry said on Monday. The endorsement hands Sall crucial backing from his own country, despite a rift between the two men that has defined Senegalese politics for the past two years. Faye made the decision after meeting with Sall on Friday, according to the ministry statement. He instructed his government to “fully mobilize” behind the bid, saying Sall’s campaign “is now Senegal’s candidacy in the service of Africa.” A rivalry that has run for two years Sall governed Senegal from 2012 to 2024. His attempt to postpone that year’s presidential election set off deadly street protests before Senegal’s Constitutional Council struck the move down. Faye went on to win the election and took office in April 2024, but relations between the two men stayed tense well after the handover. Faye’s government has accused Sall’s administration of financial mismanagement and political repression, charges Sall denies. That mismanagement claim has since taken a specific shape. Senegal’s Court of Auditors found that Sall’s government had hidden roughly $7 billion in borrowing, a figure S&P Global later put closer to $13 billion. The gap between Senegal’s reported and actual debt load became one of the defining controversies of Faye’s first year in office, and a recurring point of friction between the current government and its predecessor. Given that history, Monday’s endorsement marks a reversal. Sall had traveled to Dakar himself just days earlier, arriving on July 14 for his first public visit to Senegal since leaving office, specifically to seek Faye’s backing for the UN bid. Senegal had withheld that backing until Monday. A crowded and contested field Sall is one of several candidates seeking to replace UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, whose second term ends on December 31. Guterres has held the post since January 1, 2017. The Security Council will recommend his successor for a five-year term beginning January 1, 2027. Sall’s path into the race has been unusual from the start. Burundi’s UN mission notified the presidents of the General Assembly and Security Council of Sall’s nomination on March 2, submitted by President Evariste Ndayishimiye in his capacity as African Union chair, which some observers initially read as continent-wide backing. That reading did not hold. The African Union declined to formally endorse Sall’s candidacy on March 27, and his name never appeared on the agenda of the AU summit held in Addis Ababa that February. Analysts have since pointed out that Burundi’s nomination letter, while gesturing toward continental support, was legally submitted as Burundi’s own nomination rather than an AU nomination. Rwanda went further, calling the process used to advance Sall “a gross breach of AU rules and regulations.” Sall now competes against a field weighted toward Latin America. Five of six declared candidates come from South or Central America, including Michelle Bachelet Jeria, Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis, Rafael Mariano Grossi and Maria Fernanda Espinosa. Bachelet and Grossi in particular have emerged as his most direct competition, in a selection process where the five permanent Security Council members hold veto power over whoever ultimately gets recommended to the General Assembly. Sall has also worked to build ties in Washington. In a June interview, he told Breitbart News he supports Trump’s push to overhaul the UN, describing Trump as “a peace builder” and voicing support for what Trump’s team has branded an effort to “Make the UN Great Again.” He made those comments ahead of a trip to Washington as part of his campaign. Domestic politics collide with a global campaign For Faye, the endorsement carries risk as well as opportunity. His government came to power partly on promises to hold Sall’s administration accountable for the hidden debt and for what Faye’s camp has called political repression during Sall’s final years in office. Publicly channeling state support into Sall’s UN campaign, even while those accusations remain unresolved, exposes Faye to criticism at home that he is prioritizing Senegal’s international standing over domestic accountability. Sall’s own credibility problem extends beyond the debt scandal. Critics in Senegal have also raised questions about his record on press freedom and the treatment of political opponents during his 12 years in power, questions that resurfaced as soon as his UN candidacy became public in March. Framing Sall’s bid as a national project rather than a personal one appears to be part of Faye’s strategy for managing that domestic tension. By describing the candidacy as being “in the service of Africa,” Faye positioned his government’s support as a continental gesture rather than a personal favor to a man his own administration has spent nearly two years investigating. Whether that framing holds may depend on how the broader selection process unfolds in the coming months. The formal election is expected to take place at the UN General Assembly session in September, giving Sall a matter of weeks to convert Senegal’s endorsement, and whatever residual AU goodwill exists, into the kind of broad support needed to win over the Security Council’s permanent members. For now, Faye’s statement gives Sall something he did not have a week ago: an unambiguous public declaration from his home government, delivered by the man who defeated him.

Read More »
southern iran us strikes anger

Southern Iranians blame Trump, not Tehran, for wartime misery

July 20, 2026 No Comments

Anger at U.S. strikes runs deep in a region long hostile to Iran’s clerics, yet no new protest wave has emerged Opposition to Iran’s clerical government has simmered for years in the country’s poorer southern provinces. But after weeks of concentrated U.S. strikes on the region, many residents say their anger now points at President Donald Trump and the air campaign that has torn through their daily lives. Southern Iran sits along the Strait of Hormuz and has absorbed some of the heaviest American attacks on ports, energy sites and transport links. Washington says the strikes target Iran’s ability to threaten shipping through the strait. Tehran says the campaign has struck far beyond anything with a legitimate military purpose. Reuters interviewed more than two dozen residents across the south by phone and messaging apps. Most agreed the strikes had gone past targets with any clear military value. “Trump has ruined our lives more than the Islamic rulers did,” said Amin, who runs a small boarding house for tourists in the south. He blamed the U.S. campaign for deepening economic hardship that predates the war. No new wave of unrest in the south None of the residents Reuters spoke with, despite describing themselves as opponents of the ruling system and some having taken part in earlier protests, said the war had built support for renewed demonstrations against the government. “I feel like I’m suffocating,” Amin said, describing the toll of the strikes. That kind of exhaustion helps explain why provinces with a history of anti-government protest have stayed quiet through the war, a quiet that runs counter to what Trump appeared to expect when the conflict began. Like the other Iranians interviewed, Amin asked that his family name be withheld out of fear of retaliation. Not every resident has turned against the fight entirely. Reza, 62, fought in the 1988-89 Iran-Iraq war and has little patience left for Iran’s theocratic system; his son was detained during mass protests in January. Even so, the retired teacher said he would take up arms again if his country needed him. “If my country needs me I’ll take up arms again, not for this regime but for the soil beneath my feet. It’s the least I owe it,” he said from his home in Abadan, in the southwestern province of Khuzestan. Few people Reuters spoke with expressed support for Iran’s rulers either, a gap that could pose problems for Tehran down the line. The clerical leadership worries that prolonged economic pain could turn its own base, largely middle- and low-income Iranians, against it, particularly if a peace deal continues to slip out of reach. A region built from several ethnic minorities Southern Iran’s four provinces, Hormozgan, Bushehr, Khuzestan and Sistan-Baluchistan, span a humid, rugged coastline stretching from Iraq to Pakistan. Khuzestan holds a large Arab minority. Sistan-Baluchistan is home to Iran’s Baluchi minority. Hormozgan has a substantial Sunni Muslim population in a country governed by a Shi’ite Muslim, Persian-majority establishment. All three groups have long described facing discrimination under the Islamic Republic. Iran’s minority communities extend beyond the south to Kurds in the west, Azeris in the northwest and Turkmen in the northeast, groups that have opposed the ruling clerics for decades over issues including the right to teach and use native languages in schools and courts, along with government policies residents say have damaged local environments and health care. The south holds most of Iran’s oil and gas reserves, yet residents describe low investment and limited opportunity, plus state services thin enough that power grids buckle under summer heat. “The U.S. attacks have deepened our problems. No electricity for hours means no water for hours in this heat,” said Hadi, a grocery shop owner in Khuzestan province. “I love Iran, not the Islamic Republic and those that are calling for continuation of the war, while sitting in their air-conditioned homes and offices. This war should stop. Enough is enough,” he added. Iranian authorities deny any pattern of regional, ethnic or religious discrimination. Still, southern towns were flashpoints of opposition during the January unrest and in earlier rounds of protest in 2022 and 2019. Nightly explosions, daytime heat Majid, a 41-year-old engineer in Konarak, said the war has layered new fear onto a town already worn down by years of neglect. Nights bring the sound of explosions. Days bring heat, extended blackouts and worry over water pipes running dry. Power cuts have hit hardest in provinces where summer temperatures routinely pass 40 degrees Celsius, or 104 Fahrenheit, cutting off air conditioning and disrupting water systems that rely on electric pumps to function. In Bushehr, home to Iran’s only working nuclear power plant, high school student Samad said the nightly attacks have made it impossible to concentrate on his exams. “I wanted freedom, but look what Trump brought for us,” he said.

Read More »
houthis naval blockade saudi arabia

Houthis declare naval blockade on Saudi Arabia as Iran, US weigh ceasefire proposal

July 20, 2026 No Comments

Houthi rebels announced a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia on Monday, opening a new front in a war that already stretches from the Gulf to the Red Sea and threatens a large share of the world’s oil supply. The Yemen-based, Iran-aligned group said its armed forces were imposing “a maritime embargo against the criminal Saudi enemy, based on the equation of ‘an eye for an eye’, effective immediately.” The Houthis framed the move as retaliation for what they called “an unjust and oppressive siege” on Yemen by Saudi Arabia. Saudi authorities had not responded publicly to the announcement as of Monday evening. The blockade threat lands at a delicate moment. Iran had been pushing the Houthis to shut down the Bab el-Mandeb strait, the narrow passage connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden, if the United States kept striking Iranian power infrastructure. A full closure of Bab el-Mandeb would cut global oil supply by 7%, according to figures cited in reporting on the conflict, since most Saudi oil exports have no other route out of the region. That would stack on top of a 10% reduction in global oil flows already caused by fighting in the Gulf. Oil prices spiked briefly after the Houthi statement circulated, then eased as traders weighed the possibility of a diplomatic opening. That opening may already be taking shape. Iran’s Foreign Ministry said mediators had presented “proposals” to Tehran, though officials gave no specifics. A senior Iranian official told Reuters separately that Tehran had received a proposal for a 10-day ceasefire aimed at rescuing an interim agreement signed last month, one meant to eventually produce a lasting end to a war that started on February 28 with combined U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran. Neither the ministry nor the official identified who was brokering the talks or what terms were on the table. Pakistan may be reentering the picture. Two Pakistani government sources told Reuters that Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni had asked Islamabad to resume a mediation role it had stepped back from earlier in the conflict. Whatever diplomatic momentum exists is competing with a war that shows no sign of slowing on the ground. U.S. forces carried out another night of strikes on Iranian cities, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards answered with attacks on American military assets scattered across the region. President Donald Trump defended the latest round of strikes as a response to the deaths of up to three American service members in recent Iranian attacks, doing so while facing rising political pressure at home over gasoline prices that have climbed since the war began and since Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz. The United States has answered with its own blockade, this one aimed at Iran. The U.S. military said Monday it had redirected seven commercial vessels and disabled an eighth as part of a naval blockade on Iranian ports. Two economies now sit under competing sieges: Saudi Arabia facing a Houthi embargo, Iran facing an American one, with the world’s shipping lanes caught between them. The death toll from the broader war has reached thousands, most of them in Iran and Lebanon. Israeli forces occupy part of Lebanon following attacks on Israel by Hezbollah, which has said its strikes are acts of solidarity with Tehran. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun plans to meet Trump at the White House on Tuesday to lay out a plan for disarming Hezbollah and securing an Israeli troop withdrawal. Israel also maintains forces in Gaza, two years after Hamas’ October 7, 2023 attack on southern Israeli communities triggered that war. Hamas named Khalil Al-Hayya, its top negotiator, as the group’s overall leader on Monday. One analyst who follows the group said the appointment could point toward a tougher Hamas position on disarmament, though the group offered no public statement explaining the timing of the choice. In the Strait of Hormuz, the picture on the water grew murkier over the weekend. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps said two oil tankers exploded while attempting to transit the strait via what it called an “unsafe” route. That statement followed a separate claim a day earlier, when the Guard described two ships as involved in an “accident” in the same stretch of water. Iranian officials have not said whether the two incidents were connected, and Reuters said it could not independently verify either account. A separate vessel was hit by an unidentified projectile off the coast of Oman, near the mouth of the strait, according to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations agency. The agency said the ship was left adrift but that its crew survived unharmed. U.S. Central Command said Monday marked its ninth consecutive night of strikes against Iran, describing the campaign as an effort to reduce Iran’s ability to threaten commercial vessels moving through the strait. Inside Iran, explosions were reported in five cities and towns: Tabriz, Chabahar, Konarak, Bandar Mahshahr and Bandar Imam Khomeini. Iran’s state news agency IRNA said one person was killed and several others wounded southwest of Tabriz. Iran’s own strikes reached beyond its borders. The Revolutionary Guard said it fired ballistic missiles at U.S. aircraft stationed at Jordan’s Aqaba airport, and also targeted military assets at Kuwait’s Al-Adiri camp and Ali Al Salem Air Base, along with positions inside Syria. Air raid sirens sounded across Bahrain throughout the day Monday, and Kuwait’s army said it intercepted Iranian drones for a second time in the conflict. Kuwait’s government reported that a desalination plant in the country was struck for the second consecutive day on Sunday, sparking a fire. Officials called it a direct strike on civilian water infrastructure. Desalination plants supply most of the drinking water across several Gulf states, serving tens of millions of people in a region with few natural freshwater sources. Iran, for its part, accused the U.S. on Saturday of striking one of Tehran’s own desalination facilities, though it offered no evidence to support the claim. The Houthi blockade announcement adds a new variable to a conflict already testing the limits of Gulf energy infrastructure, water supplies and shipping routes that link Middle East oil to markets worldwide. Whether the ceasefire proposal circulating between Tehran and international mediators gains traction may determine whether that blockade takes effect at all, or whether it becomes one more front in a war that started as a two-country conflict and has since drawn in Yemen, Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain and Oman.

Read More »
Ed Markey Trump impeachment call

Democratic senator calls for Trump’s impeachment after primetime speech

July 17, 2026 No Comments

Senator Ed Markey called on his congressional colleagues Thursday night to impeach President Trump over what he described as an effort to undermine elections, responding to the president’s primetime address earlier that evening. During the half-hour White House speech, Trump repeated his longstanding claim that major vulnerabilities in the country’s voting systems have significantly affected election outcomes, a claim that has not been supported by evidence of any pivotal security breach in recent elections. “Trump must be impeached for undermining and subverting our free and fair elections,” Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in a statement. Trump revives Obama cover-up claim During the address, Trump also promoted a debunked conspiracy theory alleging that the Obama administration covered up foreign interference in a past election. He described what he called the discovery of so-called “burn bags,” material he said had been designated for destruction. “Recently, we found significant numbers of burn bags information, and this is a group of bags that were used to destroy information, given by President Barack Hussein Obama to be burned,” Trump said. “It was supposed to be burned. These bags were supposed to be at a different level by different people, incinerated and checked, but it never happened. Maybe we got lucky. But the findings are stunning.” Trump did not provide documentation supporting the claim during the address. A pattern of election disputes Trump was impeached in 2021 for inciting the January 6 attack on the Capitol, one of two impeachments during his first term. He has never accepted Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election and spent much of the past year pushing to restrict mail-in voting, a method that expanded significantly during the 2020 election and that Trump has blamed for his loss that year. The Supreme Court rejected a Trump-backed legal challenge to late-arriving mail ballots earlier this year. The SAVE America Act Trump used Thursday’s address to press Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, formally known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act. The bill would require voters to present documentary proof of citizenship when registering for federal elections and would mandate photo identification to vote in person. Acceptable documents include a REAL ID indicating citizenship, a U.S. passport, or a certified birth certificate. A standard driver’s license without the citizenship indicator would not qualify, since noncitizens can legally hold driver’s licenses in many states. “How easy is that to do, unless you want to cheat?” Trump said. “The only reason you wouldn’t do it is you want to cheat because your policies are so bad and your candidates are so pathetic that you can’t get away or can’t get elected any other way.” The House passed the bill in February on a largely party-line vote, 218 to 213, with one Democrat joining Republicans in support. The legislation has stalled in the Senate, where it needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. Republicans hold 53 seats, meaning at least seven Democrats would need to cross over, support that has not materialized. One Republican, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has also voted against advancing the bill. Critics of the measure, including the League of Women Voters, argue that few Americans carry the specific documents the bill would require and that citizenship is already verified during registration under existing law. Data cited by voting rights groups shows federal citizenship-verification cases flag only a small fraction of registrants as potential noncitizens, and many of those cases involve people who had already submitted proof of citizenship. Supporters counter that the requirements close a gap in a system that currently relies on self-attestation, and note that the bill includes a process for notifying and giving voters a chance to demonstrate citizenship before removal from rolls. Separately, the House included a $10 billion incentive-based version of the policy in its July budget resolution, an approach that would let states qualify for federal election funding by adopting the citizenship and photo ID requirements rather than mandating them nationwide. Republicans resist rule changes The Senate has been unable to move the House-passed bill to Trump’s desk. Most Senate Republicans, while broadly aligned with the president on the substance of the bill, have declined to take the extreme step of changing filibuster rules to pass it with a simple majority. Only a small number of Trump’s most vocal Senate allies have backed that approach. Senator Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, responded to Thursday’s address by pushing for continued debate rather than a rules change. “After tonight, it’s even clearer that the Senate should take the SAVE America Act and continue debating it until it passes,” Lee said. Political stakes ahead of the midterms Trump’s approach to elections could carry consequences beyond the current legislative fight. Democrats are widely expected to outperform Republicans in the November midterms and are favored to win control of at least the House. A Democratic majority could pursue more aggressive oversight of the administration, potentially reviving the kind of scrutiny that led to Trump’s two prior impeachments, though any such effort would still require Senate conviction to remove him from office, a threshold neither previous impeachment reached. That’s approximately 1,000 words, with the SAVE Act section expanded using verified details on the bill’s House passage, Senate vote math, and the competing arguments from supporters and critics, kept balanced rather than endorsing either side.

Read More »
Scroll to Top
Menu
Menu
Facebook Twitter Linkedin