Clicxpost

Crime

American Man, 30, Charged With Conspiracy to Murder in Tumbler Ridge School Shooting

Tumbler Ridge shooting

A 30-year-old man from Bellingham, Washington, has been arrested over the February 10 school shooting in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia. Federal prosecutors charged James Cody Bryant on Tuesday with conspiracy to murder persons in a foreign country. They allege he gave tactical advice, money and technical help to 18-year-old shooter Jesse Van Rootselaar, then agreed to help her broadcast the attack online.

The charge is an allegation, and Bryant has not been convicted of anything. It carries a potential sentence of up to life in prison. The attack killed eight people and wounded 25 others, and the shooter also died.

What Prosecutors Allege

According to the criminal complaint, Bryant and Van Rootselaar began conspiring on Discord in August 2025, about six months before the shooting. Authorities say the conversations moved from casual chat to discussions about killing multiple people in Canada.

The complaint alleges Bryant helped test equipment for a planned livestream and agreed to record and broadcast the attack. It says he gave tactical advice, sent money for items connected to the plot, and told her how to hide the plan, including by deleting messages and using virtual private networks. Prosecutors also allege he advised her on how to increase the number of casualties and recommended firearms. They say he sent money for an item she intended to use in building an explosive device.

Prosecutors allege Bryant confirmed he was receiving the livestream shortly before the shooting began.

How the Two Allegedly Connected

Federal law enforcement says the pair met three years ago on the chat site Omegle. They lost touch twice while Van Rootselaar was admitted to a mental health facility. In the six months before the shooting, they spoke daily on Discord. Among other topics, they discussed sending 3D-printed weapons across the US-Canada border.

A Mixed Picture in the Messages

The complaint describes a relationship that was not one-sided. The text messages appear to show that Bryant first suggested a shopping center as a target instead of a school. Authorities also allege he sometimes tried to talk Van Rootselaar out of carrying out the attack.

He did not contact police, prosecutors say. They allege he agreed to help with the livestream and said he would not “snitch.”

The Day of the Shooting

Van Rootselaar’s attack began at a home, where her mother and her 11-year-old stepbrother were killed. Police have identified the other victims at the residence as 39-year-old Jennifer Jacobs and her 11-year-old son, Emmett Jacobs.

She then drove to Tumbler Ridge Secondary School. There she shot and killed five children aged 12 or 13 and a 39-year-old educational assistant, Shannda Aviugana-Durand. The students were Abel Mwansa, Ezekiel Schofield, Kylie Smith, Zoey Benoit and Ticaria Lampert.

Police say Van Rootselaar used an improvised explosive device at the school, fired through locked classroom doors and exchanged gunfire with officers. She died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Counting the shooter, nine people died.

According to the complaint, after the killings at the home, Van Rootselaar could not start a family vehicle. Bryant allegedly advised her on getting it running so she could continue to the school. Prosecutors cite that exchange as evidence that his involvement went well beyond knowing an attack was being contemplated.

An Investigation on Both Sides of the Border

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) have investigated for months. Officers have examined physical evidence, electronic devices and online accounts. By July, they said they had reviewed more than 100 statements from students, educators and first responders and were working with the FBI on digital forensic analysis. They also said at that point that further charges had not been ruled out.

Court documents released earlier gave a partial picture of the shooter. An RCMP investigator described Van Rootselaar as having “mental health problems” and being “fascinated by firearms.” Investigators traced her online activity and seized electronic devices, trying to learn how the attack was planned and whether anyone else knew about it.

Tuesday’s case alleges that Bryant was one of those people.

The FBI worked with Homeland Security Investigations and the RCMP. American prosecutors brought the conspiracy charge because the alleged planning took place partly in Washington state, while the intended killings were in Canada.

Mike Herrington, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Seattle, said no investigation can bring back the eight people killed. He said US and Canadian officials are committed to bringing justice and holding those responsible accountable. He also thanked the RCMP for its help throughout the investigation that led to Tuesday’s charges.

A Town Still Recovering

Tumbler Ridge has not returned to normal. The original secondary school has not reopened for regular operation, and the community continues to need mental-health and victim-support services.

The shooting has also produced separate legal fights over what authorities and technology companies knew beforehand. One involves OpenAI and allegations about Van Rootselaar’s use of ChatGPT. The company has said it did not alert authorities at the time because the chats did not meet its threshold for a credible or imminent plan to seriously harm others.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has since apologized to the victims’ families. “I am deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement,” Altman wrote in an open letter in April.

What Happens Next

The arrest answers one question and opens another. Investigators wanted to know whether anyone besides the shooter knew about the plan. The complaint says Bryant did, and that he took part in it.

The court now has to decide whether the alleged online relationship between Bryant and Van Rootselaar amounts to a criminal conspiracy. Prosecutors say the messages, money transfers and livestream preparations show an agreement to carry out the attack. Bryant’s defense has not been made public in the information available. The RCMP said earlier this year that more charges remained possible, and Tuesday’s arrest shows the investigation is still producing results eight months after the shooting.

For the families in Tumbler Ridge, the charge is the first time a second person has been accused in connection with the attack.

RECOMMENDED
Crime

Cornell Bodycam Shows Moment Accused Frat Brother Is Banned From Campus

By George Mensah 5 min read

Newly released bodycam footage shows Cornell police telling a fraternity member accused in a sexual assault lawsuit that he is no longer allowed on the university’s grounds. ABC News first shared the video, which was released with audio of a call between the alleged victim and Chi Phi member Matthew Ingalls, recorded days after the alleged assault in October 2024.

The woman is identified in court documents only as Jane Doe. No one named in her lawsuit has been arrested or charged with a crime.

What the bodycam footage shows

The video shows a Cornell Police Department officer speaking to one of the accused students after the university’s investigation into the alleged incident. The student’s identity is obscured.

‘Take a look at that,’ the officer says. ‘Per the suspension, he is barred from any of the grounds owned, operated, maintained by Cornell University.’

The footage captures the point where the university’s discipline became a physical restriction on where the student could go. It does not show what led to the suspension, and it does not say which of the accused men is on camera.

The recorded phone call

Jane Doe recorded a call with Ingalls in the days after the night in question. ABC News released the audio alongside the bodycam video.

Early in the call, Ingalls says: ‘You did tell me you were sober, by the way.’

Jane Doe disputes that. She tells him he ‘already knew I was 10 shots deep’ when he and six others allegedly sexually assaulted her.

In one message to Ingalls she wrote: ‘If I wanted to take this somewhere, what y’all did would be classified as gang rape.’

She also told him she had spent time in an emergency room and in therapy afterwards, because there was ‘so much damage on my body and my brain.’

Ingalls maintained his innocence. He told her she had convinced him she was not intoxicated and ‘hadn’t been anywhere’ that night. Jane Doe disputed that as well.

Two accounts of the same evening

Jane Doe asked Ingalls to walk her through the night, including how a threesome began in his fraternity house.

Ingalls described it this way: ‘So, you come in, say hi, and we start dancing for maybe like three to five minutes… And then I pop the question, you say yes.’

He said the two of them ‘didn’t know who else to bring’ into the room, so he found another man on the dance floor who agreed, ‘and then we go upstairs.’

Jane Doe told him she did not remember who all of the men were. She recalled four men on a bed at one point, with more standing around them.

Ingalls answered: ‘I have racked my brain for this mystery. You know, it’s possible that both of us, like, remember this and it’s not true.’

She pushed back: ‘No, because I remember looking up and being like, ‘That is too many people.’

Ingalls can be heard trying to ease Jane Doe’s distress during the call. According to her lawsuit, he did not mention that he had texted the fraternity’s group chat while the alleged assault was happening.

What the lawsuit alleges

Jane Doe filed her civil lawsuit in September. It claims she was sexually assaulted in the Chi Phi fraternity house in 2024 over a period of seven hours, and that she was pressured to snort ketamine.

The filing alleges that Ingalls posted a photo of her to the group chat with a message urging other members to join. It also alleges that one of the men posted in the fraternity’s active-members Snapchat group that a woman was available upstairs, in crude terms. The filing includes an image of the purported chat. The Daily Mail has not independently verified it.

Alongside Ingalls, the lawsuit names Jonathan Newell, Winston Lee, Gillio Lopes, Diego Sarabia, Scott Norris and Scott Kretzschmar. The allegations against all seven are unproven, and the audio released so far does not address most of them.

Her earlier statement and the district attorney’s decision

Jane Doe first gave investigators a sworn statement. In it she said she consented to sex with two of the men, but felt increasingly incapacitated as the night went on and more men allegedly joined.

The local district attorney investigated at the time and dismissed the case. The office said there was ‘insufficient evidence to support criminal charges.’

That decision ended the criminal route. The civil lawsuit uses a different process, and Jane Doe is using it to seek a ruling on what happened in the house.

How Cornell disciplined the students

Cornell’s own investigation reached different results for the men involved. Ingalls and one other student were expelled. Two others were suspended. Two were found not to be involved. One had already graduated, so the university could not punish him.

The bodycam video fits the suspension stage. Under Cornell’s process, a suspended student can be barred from every property the university owns, operates or maintains, which is what the officer tells the student on camera.

What happens next

The lawsuit is pending, and the material released so far gives no hearing dates. The audio and video are the first public look at how the accused and the accuser spoke about the night within days of it, and they show the two sides disagreeing on whether she was sober and on how the night began.

Readers should keep in mind that the recorded call was made by Jane Doe, that Ingalls has said he is innocent, and that none of the seven men has been charged. Court filings and any responses from the defendants will show how each side describes the night under oath.

ADVERTISEMENT
Scroll to Top