SpaceX wins $733M Space Force launch contract

George Mensah
October 19, 2024

The U.S. Space Force has awarded SpaceX a contract worth $733 million for eight launches, reinforcing the organization’s efforts to […]

The U.S. Space Force has awarded SpaceX a contract worth $733 million for eight launches, reinforcing the organization’s efforts to increase competition among space launch providers. This deal is part of the ongoing “National Security Space Launch Phase 3 Lane 1” program, overseen by Space Systems Command (SSC), which focuses on less complex missions involving near-Earth orbits.

Under the contract, SpaceX will handle seven launches for the Space Development Agency and one for the National Reconnaissance Office, all using Falcon 9 rockets. These missions are expected to take place no earlier than 2026.

Space Force launch contract

In 2023, the Space Force divided Phase 3 contracts into two categories: Lane 1 for less risky missions and Lane 2 for heavier payloads and more challenging orbits. Although SpaceX was chosen for Lane 1 launches, competitors like United Launch Alliance and Blue Origin were also in the running. The Space Force aims to foster more competition by allowing new companies to bid for future Lane 1 opportunities, with the next bidding round set for 2024. The overall Lane 1 contract is estimated to be worth $5.6 billion over five years.

Lt. Col. Douglas Downs, SSC’s leader for space launch procurement, emphasized the Space Force’s expectation of more competitors and greater variety in launch providers moving forward. The Phase 3 Lane 1 contracts cover fiscal years 2025 to 2029, with the option to extend for five more years, and the Space Force plans to award at least 30 missions over this period.

While SpaceX has a strong position now, emerging launch providers and new technologies could intensify the competition in the near future.

How To Turn Any Photo Into A Windows Icon

SpaceX wins $733M Space Force launch contract

Donald Trump and the 2024 Election: Gender, Values, and an Unpredictable Outcome

7 Major Bluetooth Tracker Brands Ranked Worst To Best

Bluetooth trackers are invaluable tools for locating essential items like keys, wallets, or even bags. With just a smartphone, you can quickly find lost belongings, offering a level of convenience that avoids the potential issues of GPS trackers, such as server outages or recurring subscription fees. However, there are only a few major brands offering Bluetooth trackers, which can make it challenging to decide which one is the best fit for your needs.

In this post, we will explore the 7 major Bluetooth tracker brands, ranking them from worst to best, based on their features, compatibility, and overall performance.

Jiobit

Jiobit, a Life360 brand, primarily operates as a GPS tracker but incorporates Bluetooth technology in its Jiobit Gen 3 Tracker. This combination of GPS and Bluetooth enhances its accuracy and range, and it even offers a Bluetooth Alert feature to notify you when an item moves out of a designated range.

However, Jiobit’s major drawback is that it requires a monthly subscription for full functionality, including its Bluetooth features. At over $100 for the tracker itself and nearly $20 per month for the subscription, it is one of the priciest options on this list. Given the cost, poor customer feedback, and limited reliability, Jiobit is not the best option if you’re primarily seeking a Bluetooth tracker.

eufy

eufy’s Bluetooth trackers are geared mainly toward Apple devices, which limits their appeal. Apple users already have access to the more reliable and integrated AirTag, making eufy a less compelling choice for this market. Furthermore, eufy has faced privacy concerns regarding its other products, such as security cameras.

Although eufy trackers come in various designs, including card-shaped versions for wallets and small rounded ones for keychains, their limited compatibility and lack of additional features make them less appealing. Despite being inexpensive, their inconsistent battery life and functionality push them lower on the list compared to other brands.